Hi,

I’m trying to transpose an existing animation that connects the unit circle to the graphs of cos⁡(θ)\ and sin⁡(θ)\ into a complex-numbers visualization, so that students can clearly see the link between

z=eiθ=cos⁡θ+isin⁡θ,arg⁡(z)=θ,∣z∣=1

and the corresponding real/imaginary components.

Goal: a dynamic view where a point z(θ) moves on the unit circle in the complex plane while (simultaneously)

• the projections show ℜ(z)=cos⁡θ\  and ℑ(z)=sin⁡θ,

•  the graphs of cos⁡θ and sin⁡θ are traced against θ\,

• and/or the angle θ\ and argument are displayed in a clean, didactic way.

To better illustrate my objective, here is the link to the target animation I would like to transpose: 

Illustration

Thank you in advance for your insights and feedback.

Animation_Question.mw

Hello everyone
Dear experienced and expert friends
As a beginner, I would like to ask if any of my friends can guide me.
The following commands are related to Mathematica:

plots = Table[n = sValues[[i]];
   ParametricPlot[{1 - 2/n - 1.5/n^2 + (1.33 - 2/n) \[Gamma] - 
      0.0740741 (15 + 4*n) \[Gamma]^2, 
     12/n^2 + (16 \[Gamma])/n + (80 \[Gamma]^2)/9}, {\[Gamma], 0, 
     0.06}, PlotStyle -> colors[[i]], 
    PlotRange -> {{-10, 10}, {-10, 10}}], {i, Length[sValues]}];

Show[plots, Frame -> True, FrameLabel -> {"\!\(\*
StyleBox[SubscriptBox[\"n\", \"s\"],\nFontSize->16,\n\
FontColor->GrayLevel[0]]\)", "\!\(\*
StyleBox[\"r\",\nFontSize->16,\nFontColor->GrayLevel[0]]\)"}, 
 GridLinesStyle -> Black, PlotRange -> {{0.94, 1}, {0, 0.06}}, 
 PlotLegends -> 
  Placed[LineLegend[sValues, LegendLabel -> "s,w"], {0.5, 0.5}], 
 ImageSize -> 400]

I want to rewrite this process in Maple for my own functions.
I would be grateful if it is possible or if these commands are rewritten in a complete and executable form in Maple for me so that I can understand the working pattern. Or at least an equivalent command that can do this in Maple is introduced
Thank you all

What does Error, (in dsolve/numeric/bvp) bad index into Matrix mean?
Also, I'm trying to run it, it is slow, any suggestions?

restart;
with(Student[VectorCalculus]);
with(DynamicSystems);
with(DEtools);
with(PDEtools, ReducedForm, declare, diff_table, dsubs);
NULL;
 #Digits:= trunc(evalhf(Digits)); #generally a very efficient setting

# Here we solve a 1D problem in 3 regions. In each region, we have concentration and potential (c,phi) distributions,
# We first solve the unperturbed steady-state problem and then the linearized perturbation problem (which rely on the steady state).
# Each region is defined in x = 0..1, and the regions are connected by interface conditions that 
# connect (c1(1),phi1(1)) to (c2(0),phi2(0)) and (c2(1),phi2(1)) to (c3(0),phi3(0))

Q:=10;   omega:=100;     J0:= 0.01;   # parameters
                            Q := 10

                          omega := 100

                           J0 := 0.01

# The unperturbed steady-state

c1:=1-J0/2*x: 
c3:=1-J0/2*(x-1):  
c12:= eval(c1,x=1); 
c32 := eval(c3,x=0); 
S1:=sqrt(Q^2+4*c12^2): 
S3:=sqrt(Q^2+4*c32^2):  
c21:=eval((S1-Q)/2); 
c23:=eval((S3-Q)/2);  
I0:=fsolve(Q*i0/2/J0*ln((J0*S1-Q*i0)/(J0*S3-Q*i0))=(J0-S1+S3)/2,i0);  
V:=(I0/J0+1)*ln(c32/c12)+ln((c21+Q)/(c23+Q))+(J0+2*c23-2*c21)/Q; # the potential drop across the system 
c2:=solve(y-c21+Q*I0/2/J0*ln((Q*I0-Q*J0-2*J0*y)/(Q*I0-Q*J0-2*J0*c21))=-J0/2*x,y):  
phi1:=I0/J0*ln(c1)+V: 
phi3:=I0/J0*ln(c3): 
dphi1:=diff(phi1,x); 
dphi3:=diff(phi3,x); 
phi21:=I0/J0*ln(c12)+V-0.5*ln((c21+Q)/c21); 
phi2:=(2*c21-2*c2+Q*phi21-J0*x)/Q: 
dphi2:=diff(phi2,x); 
dphi12 := eval(dphi1, x=1); 
dphi21 := eval(dphi2, x=0); 
dphi23 := eval(dphi2, x=1); 
dphi32 := eval(dphi3, x=0); 
INT1 := int(1/(2*c1), x = 0 .. 1); 
INT2 := int(1/(2*c2 + Q), x = 0 .. 1); 
INT3 := int(1/(2*c3), x = 0 .. 1); 
INT := INT1 + INT2 + INT3;
                      c12 := 0.9950000000

                       c32 := 1.005000000

                      c21 := 0.09804129000

                      c23 := 0.1000024500

                      I0 := 0.01419804328

                       V := 0.02539628566

                              0.007099021640   
                dphi1 := - --------------------
                           1 - 0.005000000000 x

                              0.007099021640        
           dphi3 := - ------------------------------
                      1.005000000 - 0.005000000000 x

                     phi21 := -2.299074561

dphi2 := (0.001000000000 LambertW(-0.2818670588 exp(-0.2818670588

   - 0.0007043224058 x)))/(1

   + LambertW(-0.2818670588 exp(-0.2818670588 - 0.0007043224058 x)

  )) - 0.001000000000

                   dphi12 := -0.007134695118

                   dphi21 := -0.001392499832

                   dphi23 := -0.001391964358

                   dphi32 := -0.007063703124

                      INT1 := 0.5012541824

                     INT2 := 0.09805801917

                      INT3 := 0.4987541511

                       INT := 1.098066353

sys1 := {
-omega*C11(x)+diff(diff(C12(x), x), x)=0,
omega*C12(x)+diff(diff(C11(x), x), x) = 0,
-omega*C21(x)+diff(diff(C22(x), x)+(c2*sigma2-C22(x)*dphi2*Q)/(2*c2+Q), x) =0,
 omega*C22(x)+diff(diff(C21(x), x)+(c2*sigma1-C21(x)*dphi2*Q)/(2*c2+Q), x) = 0,
-omega*C31(x)+diff(diff(C32(x), x), x)=0,
omega*C32(x)+diff(diff(C31(x), x), x) = 0
}:

sys2 := {
diff(FA1(x), x) = C11(x)*dphi1/c1,
diff(FA2(x), x) = C21(x)*dphi2/(c2+Q/2),
diff(FA3(x), x) = C31(x)*dphi3/c3,
diff(FB1(x), x) = C12(x)*dphi1/c1,
diff(FB2(x), x) = C22(x)*dphi2/(c2+Q/2),
diff(FB3(x), x) = C32(x)*dphi3/c3
}: 

Bc := {
C11(0) = 0, C12(0) = 0,  C31(1) = 0, C32(1) = 0,
FA1(0) = 0, FB1(0) = 0,  FA3(1) = 0, FB3(1) = 0, 

2*C11(1)/c12 = C21(0)/(c21+Q)+C21(0)/c21, 
2*C12(1)/c12 = C22(0)/(c21+Q)+C22(0)/c21,
C21(1)/(c23+Q)+C21(1)/c23 = 2*C31(0)/c32,
C22(1)/(c23+Q)+C22(1)/c23 = 2*C32(0)/c32,

D(C11)(1)+dphi12*C11(1)-sigma1/2-c12*D(FA1)(1) = D(C21)(0)+dphi21*C21(0)-(c21+Q)*sigma1/(2*c21+Q)-(c21+Q)*D(FA2)(0),
D(C12)(1)+dphi12*C12(1)-sigma2/2-c12*D(FB1)(1) = D(C22)(0)+dphi21*C22(0)-(c21+Q)*sigma2/(2*c21+Q)-(c21+Q)*D(FB2)(0),
D(C11)(1)-dphi12*C11(1)+sigma1/2+c12*D(FA1)(1) = D(C21)(0)-dphi21*C21(0)+c21*sigma1/(2*c21+Q)+c21*D(FA2)(0),
D(C12)(1)-dphi12*C12(1)+sigma2/2+c12*D(FB1)(1) = D(C22)(0)-dphi21*C22(0)+c21*sigma2/(2*c21+Q)+c21*D(FB2)(0),

D(C31)(0)+dphi32*C31(0)-sigma1/2-c32*D(FA3)(0) = D(C21)(1)+dphi23*C21(1)-(c23+Q)*sigma1/(2*c23+Q)-(c23+Q)*D(FA2)(1),
D(C32)(0)+dphi32*C32(0)-sigma2/2-c32*D(FB3)(0) = D(C22)(1)+dphi23*C22(1)-(c23+Q)*sigma2/(2*c23+Q)-(c23+Q)*D(FB2)(1),
D(C31)(0)-dphi32*C31(0)+sigma1/2+c32*D(FA3)(0) = D(C21)(1)-dphi23*C21(1)+c23*sigma1/(2*c23+Q)+c23*D(FA2)(1),
D(C32)(0)-dphi32*C32(0)+sigma2/2+c32*D(FB3)(0) = D(C22)(1)-dphi23*C22(1)+c23*sigma2/(2*c23+Q)+c23*D(FB2)(1)
}:
 
 

all_sys := sys1 union sys2 union Bc:
sol1 := dsolve(all_sys, initmesh = 100, maxmesh = 15000, numeric, method = bvp[midrich], output = listprocedure):
#(all_sys, numeric, method = bvp[midrich]);

Error, (in dsolve/numeric/bvp) bad index into Matrix

I'm looking for the general solution to the attached differential equation. Maple doesn't provide it. What am I doing wrong?

Download testdgl5.mw

i did try and even replace the function w(t) by anotehr thing but is not working  how i can find that and make be answer of my pde?

k1.mw

a million time i try to figure out how i can get this plot ? why my graph  in countor is not same the 3D plot? where is problem?

Bgraph1.mw

In this kind of contour plot i have two line but when i change time variable t just contour of one line wil move the other is not do any movement and is stop how i can  make the second plot one second line move too? also there is any way for ploting this kind any other option?

line-2-done.mw

It is possible to perform the simplest QFT calculations with second quantization, in Maple? Bosons in a box. See attached example. bosons_in_a_box.mw

Sure any general purpose programming language is capable of performing this task with enough effort. What I am interested in is if the physics tools has a standard way of dealing with these calculations. The general impedement when attempting the calculation is that integrations are perfomed by replacements with delta functions or kronecker delta functions, and its not clear how to force the Maple Physics package to recognize this or if that's possible. Part of the problem is that integrations in maple are defined in one dimension at a time where as in QFT the integration element is almost always atleast three dimensional, d^3x or dxdydzy, the later of which can get extremely cumbersome with even a small number of fields under consideration. I don't find much of what I am refering to mentioned in the help pages and I doubt these types of QFT calculations are possible to perform in Maple without addressing these issues.

bosons_in_a_box.mw

i don't  know  why my graph make a problem and what is issue i did plot  but this time make issue for me which i don't know where is problem there is anyone which can help and even modified the plot?

explore-chaotic.mw

In thus manuscript i got some reviewer comment which is asked to simplify this expresion and there is a lot of them maybe if i do by hand i  made a mistake becuase a lot of variable so how i can fix this issue and make thus square root are very simple as they demand

Download simplify.mw

what is problem in here

Download remove.mw

i want plot a system of differential equation and do phaseportrait i did but when i want make it a little bit more clear and colorfull like rainbow when i find the C.Q i don't know how set the option for ploting?

e1.mw

I used Maple’s odetest to check the validity of 36 exact solutions.

About half of them return zero, meaning they satisfy the ODE correctly. But the other half don’t — odetest gives nonzero expressions.

My question is:

Could there be a mistake in my assumptions, or are some of these solutions only valid under specific conditions?

I’d appreciate any clarification or suggestions.

ode-test-36.mw

I'm currently working on applying a specific method to solve a nonlinear equation. However, I've encountered a recurring issue: during the process, I often cannot determine certain parameters, which forces me to abandon the solution or switch to a different method. This has happened multiple times and is disrupting my goal of applying all intended methods consistently to a single equation.

In particular, I’m struggling to identify the correct parameters for U(ξ), which are essential for the solution. This challenge is not limited to one method I’ve faced similar problems in previous attempts, and I’m unsure why these parameters cannot be derived in some cases.

My question is: How can I manage this issue effectively? Is there a reliable way to predict or determine whether the necessary parameters will emerge correctly before fully applying a method?

I would greatly appreciate any insights or strategies you could share to help me handle this problem more systematically.

Thank you in advance for your support.

runing.mw

I have a print format problem in Maple 2024.  For documents I print out, I use a special layout where all the contents are inside a table. The table is rigged to print on A4 paper. This is useful for my math notes. I havent done this for 18+ months. There appears to be a bug in Maple 2024. Only the first page is printed. Things work ok in Maple 2023. Maybe it is a setting difference or corruption in my install. Could somebody confirm this. Also if you can reproduce the problem could you let me know if it is in Maple 2025. I haven't upgraded yet.

2025-05-15_Q_page_print_formating.mw 
2025-05-15_Q_page_print_formating_M_2023.pdf
2025-05-15_Q_page_print_formating_M_2024.pdf